This project will be completed in the middle of December 2022. The high-fidelity user interface design and usability test are in progress. While we work on the complete reader-friendly case study and publish it, read about the design process of this project "Social media, More Connectedness or Less Connectedness?"

Also, check out the initial user flow to better understand the system.

The reader-friendly case study will be published soon.
In the meantime, check out the full case study A community-driven waste management initiative
‍

Appendix:

• Problem Framing Report
• Design Exploration Report
• Heuristic Evaluation Details

Throughout the Interaction Design Methods course, we’ve explored, studied, and practiced numerous user experience research methods that are used in the industry. It is next to impossible to explore all the UX Research that exists so far in 4 months. For instance, in this book by Bella Martin and Bruce Hanington, 100 UX research methods are discussed.

My professor, Aqueasha Martin-Hammond, has come up with an amazing idea to get to know other UX research methods. It was named “UX Methods Madness Presentation.” It was an opportunity to explore other popular interaction design methods and analysis techniques that are not covered.

The main idea of this presentation is to form a group of 4-5 people and choose one of the UX Research Methods from the list. After choosing a method, each of the team members has to choose an academic paper or case study from the ACM digital portal or IEEE Xplore that uses the method. Then they have to summarize and explain—

• The method.
• The technology/interface/set of users being studied.
• The study and how the method was used to gain insights.
• The key insights from the study.

The method we have chosen is Concept Maps.
Find my summary of Concept Mapping here.
‍

Group presentation:
These presentations occurred every Thursday in the last month. The key to the presentation is to be clear but succinct. Our goal is to introduce the method with enough detail that the audience can get a summary of what it is and how it can be used. 
We had to—

• Create a 10-minute madness presentation that summarizes each method/topic aligning with the topics researched by individual team members.
• Explain—
• Timeframe: 10 minutes for the presentation and 5 minutes for the question from the audience.

• Explain—

  • The method and its history

  • How and when is used in user research.

  • Summarize 2-3 of the papers/case studies that your individual teammates researched ( you do not have to summarize all due to the time constraints)

  • Find our slides here.

Conclusion: My team members and I have learned about the nitty-grittiest of Concept Mapping; we are glad that we’ve chosen this and have it in our UX Arsenal, and really excited to use it in our UX design process.  In these 3 weeks, we have learned about some unexplored UX Research methods, and some of them were really interesting and exciting. Almost all of the teams have done a great job explaining the selected methods.

The settings option is highly overwhelming, so I looked up online and discovered I was not alone. That is why I chose it for a usability test. This usability test consists of the Blink Test, the Expectancy Test, and several tasks.

Furthermore, the participant is Sydney Anuyah, a student at SOIC, IUPUI, pursuing a master’s degree, and he uses Gmail almost daily.I have decided to conduct the study at home in a studying environment as a Contextual Inquiry.

Figure 1: Sydney performing the tasks in Gmail settings.

The Gmail Settings issues are that it is all over the place. The information is poorly organized and thus very difficult to navigate, making it less intuitive. It seems confusing to tech-savvy persons, let alone older adults and people with various impairments.

While trying to configure the setting mentioned above, I spent a considerable amount of time looking up online tutorials, blogs, etc. Gmail has over a billion daily active users, which are very much diversified; such a service should not be this hard to navigate.

Figure 2: Gmail Settings.

As mentioned previously, it is a Contextual Inquiry. Here I, as the facilitator, am going to ask the participants questions and ask them to perform predefined tasks. At the same time, I will observe the participant's reactions, emotions, and mouse cursor movement and take notes.

Gmail is widely used, so finding a real user is not difficult. I have deliberately chosen an educated and tech-savvy participant to fathom the usability for people who are not very knowledgeable and tech-savvy. In the meantime, Contextual Inquiry seemed the way to go because the issues are with navigation and Information Architecture, so observing and including moderated tasks is vital. Also, I am conducting usability testing for only one participant, thus having the time and other resources.

This usability test is measured in 4 UX metrics, such as—

• Time to success.
• Error rate.
• Completion rate.
• Satisfaction level.
  Four levels: 1-4

Questions:

1. Kindly find the setting of Gmail. (From the home page)
   Response: The participant finds the gear icon within a few seconds. Point to be noted that later in the test, the participant confused the setting and support icons.

   

   Another point is that the participant could not discover “See all settings” the first time. It took him some time to find out that it offered more settings.
   ‍Time taken: 5-6 seconds.
   Error: 1

   • Blink Test: The participant was given 5-6 seconds to look at the setting panel.

     • What do you remember the most?
       Response: The main setting panel was very overwhelming for the participant. He could not remember anything. Instead, he was talking about the initial quick settings.
       ‍
     • What stood out to you in the setting panel?
       Response: The participant was lost; he could not remember anything. However, he was clicking on the top panel. Only that seemed interactable to him; other than this, the information below was too much to take for such a short time.

   • Expectancy Test: Gave the participants 15 more seconds to look at and interact with the settings.

     • What do you expect here to happen?
       Response: “Well, I can do configurations, turn on and off many things.”
       ‍
     • Can you name any or guess what those do?
       Response: “Nope, I have to read all the texts.”
       It means the participant could not process all the information shown to him.
       ‍
     • What do you expect to be clicked on?
       Response: “There are a lot of buttons(radio buttons).”

2. (Task) Can you kindly change the language?
   Response: It took the participant to find the language settings 6-8 seconds. Then extra 4-5 seconds to find the “Save Changes” button to save the changed settings.
   
   It was pretty straightforward for him; he did not confuse or hesitant about other things.
   ‍Completion rate: 100%
   ‍Satisfaction: 4

3. (Task) Kindly turn on/off the grammar and spelling checking.
   Response: After searching for a few seconds, he could not find the setting; interestingly, he searched in Support>Help and found the guidance for changing the settings.
   Time took: About a minute.
   Satisfaction: 1

   

   Figure 3 Support > Help

4. Can you set the inbox preference, so unread messages appear on top?
   Response: “Yeah, I can do that with confidence” “It should be in the “Inbox.”After going into the inbox settings, he selected “Important first” instead of “unread” and saved it.It was perhaps because I was over-explaining the task to him, which created a bias. Time took: 30-35 seconds.
   ‍Satisfaction: 4
   ‍Error: 1
   ‍
5. Change the password.
   Response: “I should be on the first page (General).” So he clicked on general and did not find it. Then he said, “ then it must be in “accounts and imports.”And then he proceeded to change the password
   ‍Time took: 25 sec.
   ‍Error: 1
   ‍Satisfaction: 2
   ‍
6. Add an email forward.
   Response: After clicking on the top panels a few times, he found the “Forward and POP/IMAP.” So it seems like the UX writing is also a bit confusing; it should be straightforward with iconography so that users can navigate more intuitively, skimming and looking at icons just like the participant found the setting gear icon.
   Time: 15-20 sec.
   Error: 3
   ‍
7. For instance, you are on vacation, or it is a weekend, and you want to set auto email reply for whoever tries to reach you.
   Response: The participant gives up and directly searches “Help” for the option. He assumed he would not get it right or find the option. Thus he directly went on searching for the setting.
   
   Interestingly, he found an option to set auto replies for vacation. However, it does not allow him to set auto replies for weekends or “on repeat” occasions.
   
   There is a way to set that using templates. Unfortunately, there is no official documentation for it; thus, the participant could not find it.
   
   So here, the weekend/out-of-office auto-reply could be implemented using the “on repeat” option like in Outlook calendar events.
   ‍Time: 40-45s
   ‍

8. For instance, you are on vacation, or it is a weekend, and you want to set auto email reply for whoever tries to reach you.
   Response: The participant gives up and directly searches “Help” for the option. He assumed he would not get it right or find the option. Thus he directly went on searching for the setting.
   
   Interestingly, he found an option to set auto replies for vacation. However, it does not allow him to set auto replies for weekends or “on repeat” occasions.
   
   There is a way to set that using templates. Unfortunately, there is no official documentation for it; thus, the participant could not find it.
   
   So here, the weekend/out-of-office auto-reply could be implemented using the “on repeat” option like in Outlook calendar events.
   Time: 40-45s